An Inconvenient Truth for Marketers: The Role and Value of Information

An inconvenient truth for IT vendors: The factors least considered by vendors in go-to-market programs are those most valued by technology buyers:
  • IT vendors focus on the ROI of their marketing programs and their sales programs. They might also talk about the ROI a buyer can expect to achieve with their product (i.e., product ROI). Few sufficiently consider the ROI a buyer expects to achieve by spending time with a vendor’s information and people -- the relationship ROI.
  • Technology marketers build marketing mix plans based on format (e.g., advertisement versus conference versus blog) and communications channel (e.g., TV versus Web versus print). But, in making IT purchase decisions, corporate buyers value content relevance and credibility over format and channel.
  • When it comes to mobilizing a sales force, most tech vendors subscribe to one sales methodology or another and institute a sequence of selling stages. Meanwhile, the buying process is far from standard.

According to a recent IDC study, buyers spend up to 4.8 hours per week, on average, with third-party information to support current or future IT purchase decisions. Of this, about three hours per week are spent on information related to new purchases or general education that can lead to new purchases.

Meanwhile, IT vendors invested over $174 billion in marketing and sales in 2007 to reach and influence technology buyers. This investment creates a lot of competition for that three hours per week per IT buyer. To engage and deepen relationships with buyers, vendors must strengthen a buyer’s return on time spent with their information, whether delivered online, at events, or through their sales teams.

I expect to see a more pronounced industrywide shift within IT sales and marketing driven by these buyer priorities. Relevance, content, and credibility will become the increasing focus of marketing mix planning and sales enablement. The catalysts of the change are rising sales and marketing costs that outpace the growth in IT spending, the commoditization of IT solutions, and the fact that savvy buyers are becoming more protective of their time. The implementers of change are many: IT marketing and sales, channel partners, content providers, content management vendors, marketing and sales consultants, media partners, and other participants
along the vendor’s go-to-market chain.

By Clare Gillan, SVP, IDC Executive and Go-To-Market Programs

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Future of Web Design Triptych

Image
Future of Web Design Triptych Without meaning to I created 3 Haiku Decks about the future of web design: Future of Web Design 1 : No More Boxes or Boundaries (embedded below) Future of Web Design 2: Mobile Ubiquitous Web Changes Everything (embedded below) Future of Web Design 3: Semantic Mobile Web Mean Brands are Context, Social is Confirmation and the only time that matters is an evolving NOW. Here is the snippet I just wrote on GPlus explaining Future of Web Design 3: *Future of Web Design 3: Semantic Web Is A Game*   Didn't want to unpack today. I also had an interesting conversation with  + Nikol Murphy  on Thursday. So a day of productive procrastination is happening (lol).     Nikol reminded me of an important truth. Google doesn't index websites they index web PAGES.  Subtle but important distinction to understand Web 3.0. Web 3.0 will be more WEB and less "website". Design will be a CSF (Critical Success Factor), but very different than wha...
Read more

Why can't you get the customer/ patient experience right?

Patients and healthcare consumers alike are seeking information on great outcomes and experience. That's right. Great outcomes and experiences. Not ordinary outcomes or experiences. Telling the healthcare consumer that you provide compassionate care and high-quality medical care, is falling on deaf ears. Especially, when the experience doesn't even come close to the claim. And as we get deeper into the Affordable Care Act with risk and value -based payment models, experience will play a deciding role in success or failure. Healthcare consumers will bypass those hospitals and healthcare providers that have less than great outcomes or experiences. Same for insurance plans, doctors and others. When the individual has some skin in the game, i.e., high out-of pocket expenses and deductibles, their experience matters. I am not saying that is fair, or right. It is a reality of a changing marketplace. When healthcare executives are surveyed, the majority say that customer/patient expe...
Read more

Where is the patient experience and satisfaction in your healthcare marketing?

Image
Patient experience and satisfaction is no longer a nice too have, but a got to have in healthcare. Difficult to achieve and tough to beat once you have it, experience and satisfaction with your medical products, clinical services and processes regardless of the vertical, be it specialty pharmacy, medical device, pharma, hospitals, doctors etc., will drive revenue. Revenue from the standpoint of Pay-for-Performance (P4P) programs and volume from consumers aka patients, selecting you in a very commoditized and provider undifferentiated healthcare market place. As you create your networks, Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), Medical Homes (MHs) and other yet undefined organizations, you have the opportunity to "get it right" this time. The healthcare consumer of today, will view your services as: value= f(cost, quality, satisfaction) as compared to the near past where value= f(cost, quality). Value here is the defining moment and is a function of cost, quality and satisfactio...
Read more